Perry Hall Mansion Downzoning 'Another Layer of Protection'
A proposal to downzone the Perry Hall Mansion property could further protect the property from development.
There are currently no plans to demolish the Perry Hall Mansion and replace it with a housing development—its four-acre lot on Meetinghouse Road remains Baltimore County-owned and the structure itself is listed on the National Register of Historic Places.
Still, downzoning the property from DR 2 (two houses per acre) to DR 1 (one house per acre) would further protect the area from future development, according to County Councilman David Marks.
Marks first announced his proposal to downzone the Perry Hall Mansion property in December 2011, as part of widespread effort to lower the development potential of more than 280 acres of Perry Hall.
He reaffirmed his support this week, associating the mansion's downzoning with his recent efforts to designate more than 55 acres of Perry Hall property as open space. The Neighborhood Commons zoning designation would protect those areas from virtually all future development.
"DR 1 is the lowest [the mansion property] can be zoned," he said. "It's not eligible to become open space ... but if at some point, it fell into private hands, this would add another layer of protection to the property."
Following a Perry Hall Improvement Association meeting in April, Donnell Zeigler of the Baltimore County Office of Planning told Patch that his office did not support the mansion's downzoning. It would needlessly devalue the county's asset, he said.
The final staff recommendation from the Office of Planning called for the mansion property to remain DR 2. The volunteer citizen advisory Planning Board, however, is supporting Marks in recommending the property be lowered to DR 1, according to county logs.
Each of the recommendations will be factored into the county's 2012 Comprehensive Zoning Map Process, which reexamines zoning designations every four years. The County Council is scheduled to vote on the final zoning map by Sept. 16.
Marks said he is "very confident" that the County Council will ultimately approve his downzoning proposal.
This is welcome news to representatives of community organizations, who have also publicly supported the mansion's downzoning—including Chris Defeo, the president of the Perry Hall Manor community association; Dennis Robinson, president of the Perry Hall Improvement Association; and Jeffrey Smith, president of the Friends of the Perry Hall Mansion.
Smith said the mansion measure may be "redundant" because the property already has some protections in place. He compared it to "wearing a belt and suspenders."
"But properties like this are few and far between. It doesn't take very long for these things to disappear. The more protection we can give it, the better," he said.
FIFA_archived
10:50 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
@Steve Redmer - here comes a softball!
"Donnell Zeigler of the Baltimore County Office of Planning told Patch that his office did not support the mansion's downzoning. It would needlessly devalue the county's asset, he said. "
Ouch!
Steve Redmer
10:59 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
lol @FIFA, I am aware of the County's resistance to down-zoning their own property, I wish some felt the same way about private property...however, I am approaching this article as it's own issue and will try to keep other zoning proposals separate...
My question stems from Councilman Marks' quote saying that, "DR 1 is the lowest [the mansion property] can be zoned," he said. "It's not eligible to become open space ..." Just wondering what prevents this property from open space zoning
Steve Redmer
10:52 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
I fully support protecting this Historical Landmark...just one quesstion though, Why can't it receive the "Neighborhood Commons", or "open space", Zoning protection? is it because there is an existing structure? if so could it be zoned "open space" with an exemption for the preservation of the mansion?
Emily Kimball
11:04 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Part of it has to do with the nature of the existing structure. It's not legally possible, as outlined by the law, Marks told me this week. Here is a link to the law: http://resources.baltimorecountymd.gov/Documents/CountyCouncil/bills%202012/b00712.pdf
Steve Redmer
11:24 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Yeah I kind of figured that was it...Can't open the PDF for some reason. in hindsight, it would have been nice if such a provision could have been written in to protect existing historic structures... Or perhaps a "Deed Restriction" or "Conservation Easement" could be bound to the title of the property... Just some thoughts, they may have already done these things or probably at least discussed them though...
Emily Kimball
11:27 am on Thursday, June 21, 2012
It's a PDF so make sure your Adobe reader is up to date, I've also attached it to the gallery.
Tim
12:08 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
If it's not up to date, just reboot your PC. Adobe updates occur after 40% of all PC reboots.
Kris
4:24 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
I feel that the best use of this real estate would be a Walgreens or perhaps a CVS, to truly represent the essence of Perry Hall.
Ktown
6:15 pm on Thursday, June 21, 2012
Restore the mansion but keep the grounds from development. This is a critical piece of Perry Hall and Methodist history.