Proposed School Budget Calls for Job Freezes, Spending Cuts
A budget offered by the schools superintendent does not call for furloughs or layoffs.
The proposed $1.2 billion operating budget for Baltimore County Schools for the 2012 fiscal year makes tough spending choices but preserves core educational goals, Superintendent Joe A. Hairston said.
The budget, which Hairston introduced to the Board of Education and the public Wednesday night, is just .5 percent or $6.5 million more than the budget for the current fiscal year.
The near-flat spending includes a 5 percent cut in school and office budgets, the freezing of 196 anticipated teacher vacancies and a delay in buying computers, furniture and library books.
Despite those cuts, the budget does not include furloughs or layoffs and does include salary raises for employees who are eligible.
“This proposed budget preserves and protects those core programs and services as outlined in the Blueprint for Progress,” he said, referring to the document that outlines the goals and objectives of the school system.
But Cheryl Bost, president of the Teachers Association of Baltimore County, said she’s not as certain the budget won’t affect the fundamentals of the system.
“We’re still too close to the classroom,” she said, referring to the 5 percent school budget reduction and the freezing of positions.
“That will have a direct impact on students and teachers,” she added.
While recent budget cycles have been tough, there were several factors that made this budget season more difficult, Hairston said.
Enrollment increased by 528 students this fall and the school system is projecting an increase next fall of 864 students, the largest projected increase in eight years.
School officials also had to fill the gap left by the loss of $19.4 million in one-time federal stimulus funds. The county government is also expected to contribute just .3 percent above the Maintenance of Effort, which is a state formula that uses enrollment to determine the minimum amount of money the county should give the school system. In the past decade, the county has contributed up to 8 percent over that figure.
County funds make up 43 percent of the proposed budget, with state funds accounting for 55 percent.
The Board of Education will vote on the budget at a later date.
Also at Wednesday's meeting, the board voted to approve the 2012 capital program budget, which includes funding for construction projects. The capital budget now goes to the county for approval. Included in this proposal are funds for an addition to Hampton Elementary School.
A public hearing will be held on the budget at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, Jan. 18, at Ridge Ruxton School in Towson.
Judy Muskauski
12:50 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
I believe the public hearing is set for Tuesday, January 18.....not the 19th.
Penny Riordan
8:19 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
Thanks Judy, we corrected this!
K Blue
10:11 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
"The near-flat spending includes a 5 percent cut in school and office budgets, the freezing of 196 anticipated teacher vacancies and a delay in buying computers, furniture and library books. " Not to beat a dead horse, but this is exactly why authorizing $80,000/$35,000 for a school sign (which I expect wasn't in the Blueprint for Progress) was such a bad move. I cannot imagine there are many students or parents out there who wouldn't had preferred more computers, furniture or library books. Or musical instruments for that matter.
Tyler Waldman
10:28 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
In fairness, the West Towson sign was paid for from the money allocated to the construction.
K Blue
10:45 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
Tyler, are you saying that that money could not have been reallocated?
Stan Modjesky
11:22 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
Mr. Waldman, I think many of us frown on the frivolous spending by the county, without regard to which budget it comes from, since at the root of things, it's all taxpayer money.
Stan Modjesky
11:24 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
As a musician and a fervent supporter of school music programs, I cannot wholly agree with county budget money (derived from taxes) being used for musical instruments, at least the way it is currently done. I grew up in much leaner times, and the school music departments then owned only large instruments that would have been difficult for students to transport: drums, mallet percussion, a sousaphone and perhaps a baritone sax. The rest of us had to furnish our own trumpets, clarinets, saxophones, flutes, etcetera. I had a simply awful trumpet that my father had bought for ten bucks at Livinston's pawnshop in 1949, and later supplanted that with an old cornet that I purchased for $12. But those were my horns, and my responsibility.
Lately the schools have taken to providing instruments at little or no cost, and the students misuse them. During the summer months most of the instrument repair shops are tied up undoing the damage that our little darlings did to their free instruments. At several schools I have seen closets full of tubas and euphoniums that appear to have been damaged beyond further repair. Even the school music stands take a beating, because the music students are not held accountable.
One of the important lessons a child takes away from music study is responsibility and discipline, and having the school supply instruments dilutes this. Money budgeted for music would be better spent improving the band rooms and seating.
K Blue
11:31 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
Dear Stan: You make some excellent points about instruments that I had not considered. While there are studies showing the benfits of children engaging in music at an early age, I understand what you are saying. I feel badly for the child whose parents cannot afford even a simple recorder, and I respect your suggestion about improving the band rooms and the seating.
Stan Modjesky
12:22 pm on Thursday, January 13, 2011
I empathize with those students too, but good music teachers always manage to find an instrument for someone who is in need and truly motivated. The free instrument, or below-market rental (whichever way it works) only keeps the marginal students in the programs.
Also, "cannot afford" can be a relative thing. I know a woman who had three children for whom she claimed she could not afford various things, including decent nutrition. But there was always enough money for booze and cigarettes.
K Blue
12:34 pm on Thursday, January 13, 2011
Dear Stan: Again, you make wonderful points. Perhaps Mr. Waldman can author an article on second-hand stores offering musical instruments. You have inspired me to watch "Mr. Holland's Opus" again.
Stan Modjesky
12:41 pm on Thursday, January 13, 2011
I would love to see an article on that subject, and would happily contribute what I know to the effort. Such an article on Patch would provide an opportunity to discuss the mistakes that parents make by buying instruments on eBay.
Tyler Waldman
1:02 pm on Thursday, January 13, 2011
I'll get on that when I can. Thanks for the suggestion.
Jim21236
11:08 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
KBlue - that's like saying I have a rowboat, but you need an aircraft carrier to fix a problem. We have to get serious about spending across the county - we have half empty schools in some parts of the county, we pay pensions to elected officials and judges that are grossly unfair to the taxpayers , we have some government employees who were hired because of nepotism (that do nothing). It all needs to be addressed and no one is doing it. I think most of the new councilpeople promised pension reform - are they working on it? The citizens are going to get more angry as these people we elect take inept measures like getting rid of signs that are already paid for, instead of addressing real issues!
K Blue
11:18 am on Thursday, January 13, 2011
Dear Jim21236: Every little bit helps and I think that pointing out wasteful spending at any level encourages future fiscal discipline and accountability. Did you see the article about Millford Mill recently? It appears that the architectural drawings were not thoroughly reviewed before construction. $7 million.