Baltimore County Council passed the “transgender bill” (Bill 3-12) by a vote split along party lines. The bill was amended in three places to include employer dress codes, and religious and education exemptions. Ultimately, the definition of "gender identity" was addressed by using the “private spaces” language that has been tested in Montgomery and Howard counties. There have been no documented incidents of transgender discrimination in Montgomery County since signing the Montgomery County bill into law in 2007 according to the Montgomery County Executive and Chief of Police.
Sharon Brackett, Board Chair for Gender Rights Maryland, had this to say:
Our success here in Baltimore County, and a few months ago in Howard County, is a testament to the forward thinking of our local elected officials. We would like to thank the entire council for having the courage to pass this legislation and in particular Councilmember Tom Quirk for being a steadfast champion for passage of this bill. In the past six months we have collectively brought these protections to over 1 million more Marylanders. This should be a strong message to Annapolis that it is time to lead the rest of the state on this matter.
Baltimore County will now join Howard, and Montgomery County and Baltimore City as the fourth jurisdiction in Maryland supporting these rights. This is a clear sign of exciting and changing times in Maryland for advocates of civil rights.
Councilmember David Marks had briefly considered voting for this bill because he said he believes that “no one should be discriminated against,” but at the decisive moment, he cast his "no" vote. This was a difficult vote for Marks. He did take the time to consider both sides of this discussion.
The bill will now be forwarded to County Executive Kevin Kamenetz who is expected to sign it.
How would you have voted on the anti-transgender discrimination bill? Tell us in the comments.
J.Garrity
9:38 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
I don't understand what "both sides" were for Marks to consider. You either support discrimination or you don't. Shame on him.
J.Garitty
6:47 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
A point of view from another J. Garitty. I support David Marks for having the courage to vote the way he did... He certainly does NOT support discrimination! Shame on you for suggesting otherwise.
...
Tim
10:03 am on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
You obviously don't understand the whole point in being a politician.
Most people don't get it. They think it's your job to vote as your own morals dictate. That's not your job.
Moreover, did it occur to you - or anyone - that Councilman Marks might have figured his vote wouldn't have mattered?
No, the average person who's represented by people like David Marks can't even begin to wrap their head around the intricasies of government management...unless they take their blinders off and actually think through these things.
Heather Patti
12:45 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
David Marks has demonstrated his bipartisanship many times, and it speaks volumes that he even considered both sides, since many of our elected officials simply vote their party's view without any evidence of critical thinking. Clearly, there was and is more to this bill than discrimination, but that's just where it's advocates want your focus to be. I guess you "don't understand " because you weren't privy to all of the intricacies contained within the bill.
Caroline Temmermand
3:24 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
No one should be discriminated against. It is really that simple. So yes, I fully support the bill.
Heather Patti
6:26 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
There are already laws protecting ALL citizens from discrimination.
Brandon
6:40 pm on Wednesday, February 22, 2012
which law might that be?
Brice
8:00 am on Thursday, February 23, 2012
What is Transgender ? If a Male Police Officer wears a woman's Thong under his uniform,would that count ? Where do you draw the line ??