.
Feedback

Legislators Reminded Not to Use Email for Campaigning

Email Monday to Lawmakers by the ethics adviser to the legislature reminds lawmakers that using state resources to advocate for the success or defeat of a ballot question is prohibited.

Lawmakers Monday were reminded not to use state resources to advocate for or against referendum questions that will appear on the Nov. 6 ballot.

Dea Daly, ethics adviser to the Maryland General Assembly, told lawmakers in an email that they may not use official letterhead or send email from their state accounts that calls for " The success or defeat of a ballot question, except in responding to an inquiry regarding the ballot questions."

The email also contains a three-page ethics opinion on the subject that outlines other topics that may not be contained in official correspondence including:

  • A member’s political campaign (whether past or future).
  • The election or defeat of an official of, or candidate for election to, the governing body of a political, quasi-political, or non-public entity.
  • Contributions for the member’s campaign fund, for the campaign of another, or for the success or defeat of a ballot question.
  • Soliciting volunteers for an election campaign or a ballot question.

[A copy of the ethics opinion is attached to this post.]

The email to lawmakers comes a week after The Quinton Report raised questions about an email sent by Del. Eric Bromwell.

Bromwell, a Perry Hall Democrat, emailed constituents an 800-word letter explaining his vote on expanded gambling during the special session in August. At the end of the email, Bromwell asked voters to join him in voting for Question 7.

The same message appears on Bromwell's blog on Patch.

In an interview with Patch last week, Bromwell said he would take the issue to legislative ethics officials for advice. The three-term legislator said he had not intended to violate rules governing the use of the state email account.

"I can see how someone would take it like that," said Bromwell. "If I've done something wrong, I'll apologize."

Matthew October 23, 2012 at 10:35 am
Wooooooow...if we could waste a little more time on this non-issue, that'd be great. Does the axe-grinding not grow tiresome?
He sent a letter to his constituents telling them why he was going to vote for something. The Mayan's must have been right, it's all over. There was actually real news last evening.
PerryHallParent October 23, 2012 at 10:49 am
What's even more amusing to me is that State resources were used to remind state public servants not to use their official state email to discuss their reasons for voting on a state public issue, something they should have been taught by the state when taking public office.
Bart October 24, 2012 at 12:32 am
I'm glad that all Bromwell got was a reminder, but even that was all full of coulds, woulds and shoulds. All he was guilty of was informing his constituents of his standing on the issue.
So very many unscrupulous people were out for blood on this issue. I'm against the expansion of gambling, but even I can't fault him.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Perry Hall Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
cangmumayi1988 June 5, 2013 at 06:36 am
7>http://gstar2013.webs.com/ http://gstarpascher.webs.com/ http://gstarfemme.webs.com/Read More http://gstarhomme.webs.com/ http://vestegstar.webs.com/ http://gstarrawjeans.webs.com/ http://gstarrawpascher.webs.com/ http://soldesgstar.webs.com/ http://gstarenligne.webs.com/ http://discountgstar.webs.com/ http://poloralphlauren2013.webs.com/ http://abbigliamentoonline.webs.com/ http://2013ralphlaurenitalia.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurenuomo.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurensaldi.webs.com/
Tim April 24, 2013 at 04:18 pm
This place is awesome. Used it a lot when my kid was 2-3. If I had another, I'd not hesitate to takeRead More him here. Then again, I watched my kid like a hawk - and you know, actually played WITH him - while we were there. As a result, my kid never came close to being injured by another unruly kid. Just saying.
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 06:55 am
My sister-in-law actually played with my nephew too Tim. Unlike EVERY OTHER single parent that wasRead More there. However, you can't tie your child to you. They came there to play. Bullies move very quick. When my nephew fell and was visibily scared, not a single parent except for one even noticed. Nobody from the library was in site. You are right that if parents were required to pay attention to their children then there would not be an opportunities for bullies because the parents of those bullies would be watching them also. When the group came from a religious school in Pikesville this is exactly what happened. All the parents stayed with their kids. All other parents, with little exception stayed in a waiting room talking amongst themselves paying little attention to their children. My nephew has been to all kinds of playgrounds and never been attacked by older kids before. Next time, if my nephew is attacked by an older child I will urge my brother to call the police and press charges against the parent. However, irreponsible Storyville need not worry -- won't be back there. Just wish our tax dollars weren't supporting this.
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 07:09 am
Let me put this in more practical terms. 1. My sister-in-law suggests that the bully seemed about 8Read More years old and probably shouldn't have been left at Storyville to begin with. There is no ID system at Storyville for childs age. 2. The bully caused various kinds of mayhem. Knocking down things, shouting, etc. No one from the library is actually in Storyville so there was no disciplinary action taken such as removing the child. 3. Parents should not view Storyville as a babysitter and not be allowed to congregate in the waiting area, leaving their children to play alone. 4. Items that could be used to cause serious injury should be removed from Storyville. 5. Cameras. If an 8 year old hits a 3 year old at Storyville where parents are suppose to be watching their children, I want proof for a court case. Yes, it's a shame it can't just be a pleasant place to take your kids but it isn't. It is filled with unrully children and uninterested parents. A child SHOULD NEVER leave a library with two bruises across his face EVER.