.
Feedback

Del. Bromwell: Stop State From Wasting Funds, Resources

Gross mismanagement of funds has come to light while most Marylanders are still struggling to make ends meet.

In early January, as the 2012 General Assembly convened, I wrote to you about the disgraceful mismanagement in several state agencies exposed by audits. The gross mismanagement of funds came to light while most Marylanders are still struggling to make ends meet.

The audit of the State Highway Administration (SHA) revealed that in order to hide overruns, the agency shifted funds between contractors and projects without the required Board of Public Works approval. Auditors also found that between 2008 and 2011, the Department of Health and Mental Hygiene paid $2.5 million in Medicaid funds to over 300 deceased persons because the agency failed to check with Social Security to identify deceased persons. The Department of Developmental Disabilities returned $25 million to the state in unspent funds, while 6,500 patients waited for needed care. The Child Support Enforcement Administration failed to collect more than $1.7 billion owed by noncustodial parents from 2007 to 2010.

The extent of the waste, fraud and mismanagement perpetrated by these and other key state agencies stagger the mind. The end result of the agency mismanagement is that Marylanders are cheated in two ways: their tax dollars are wasted, and in many instances, the care or assistance they seek and have every right to expect from the agencies is not given.

Legislation (House Bill 843), which I support has been introduced as an answer to the problem. The bill requires the General Assembly to reduce the budget of a state agency that has not satisfactorily addressed the audit’s findings by 5 percent annually. The measure also specifies that within nine months of the audit report, any agency with five or more repeat audit findings must report quarterly to the Office of Legislative Audits on corrective actions taken. Also, quarterly status reports must be submitted until the office determines that satisfactory progress has been made to address the audit’s findings.

The Office of Legislative Audits informs that in the last audit, 38 state agencies had three or more repeat findings in their previous audit report, totaling approximately 160 findings. I am hopeful that HB 843 will obtain General Assembly approval because past conduct by many agencies has shown clearly that they need to be held to higher standards of performance by strict oversight and periodic monitoring.

Would you support legislation to reduce the budgets of wasteful state agencies? Tell us in the comments.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Perry Hall Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Tim March 28, 2012 at 01:22 pm
No arguments here, Del Bromwell.
Neil B March 28, 2012 at 06:39 pm
It is one of those bills that is created to make him look good to his constituants. Nobody would ever actually pass this bill.
Tom McGhan April 1, 2012 at 10:48 am
"reduce the budget of a state agency that has not satisfactorily addressed the audit’s findings"
Are there clearly defined objective numerical criteria for "satisfactorily addressed", or can they slide with just a statement from M.O.M. that he is "satisfied" with their progress? Loopholes like that render even honest good-faith efforts at reform completely ineffective.
Eric Bromwell April 7, 2012 at 01:45 pm
This isn't my bill, Neil. This is a bill that was introduced by a Republican colleague from Carroll County. The more people that know about a bill, the better chance it has of passing.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
cangmumayi1988 June 5, 2013 at 06:36 am
7>http://gstar2013.webs.com/ http://gstarpascher.webs.com/ http://gstarfemme.webs.com/Read More http://gstarhomme.webs.com/ http://vestegstar.webs.com/ http://gstarrawjeans.webs.com/ http://gstarrawpascher.webs.com/ http://soldesgstar.webs.com/ http://gstarenligne.webs.com/ http://discountgstar.webs.com/ http://poloralphlauren2013.webs.com/ http://abbigliamentoonline.webs.com/ http://2013ralphlaurenitalia.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurenuomo.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurensaldi.webs.com/
Tim April 24, 2013 at 04:18 pm
This place is awesome. Used it a lot when my kid was 2-3. If I had another, I'd not hesitate to takeRead More him here. Then again, I watched my kid like a hawk - and you know, actually played WITH him - while we were there. As a result, my kid never came close to being injured by another unruly kid. Just saying.
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 06:55 am
My sister-in-law actually played with my nephew too Tim. Unlike EVERY OTHER single parent that wasRead More there. However, you can't tie your child to you. They came there to play. Bullies move very quick. When my nephew fell and was visibily scared, not a single parent except for one even noticed. Nobody from the library was in site. You are right that if parents were required to pay attention to their children then there would not be an opportunities for bullies because the parents of those bullies would be watching them also. When the group came from a religious school in Pikesville this is exactly what happened. All the parents stayed with their kids. All other parents, with little exception stayed in a waiting room talking amongst themselves paying little attention to their children. My nephew has been to all kinds of playgrounds and never been attacked by older kids before. Next time, if my nephew is attacked by an older child I will urge my brother to call the police and press charges against the parent. However, irreponsible Storyville need not worry -- won't be back there. Just wish our tax dollars weren't supporting this.
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 07:09 am
Let me put this in more practical terms. 1. My sister-in-law suggests that the bully seemed about 8Read More years old and probably shouldn't have been left at Storyville to begin with. There is no ID system at Storyville for childs age. 2. The bully caused various kinds of mayhem. Knocking down things, shouting, etc. No one from the library is actually in Storyville so there was no disciplinary action taken such as removing the child. 3. Parents should not view Storyville as a babysitter and not be allowed to congregate in the waiting area, leaving their children to play alone. 4. Items that could be used to cause serious injury should be removed from Storyville. 5. Cameras. If an 8 year old hits a 3 year old at Storyville where parents are suppose to be watching their children, I want proof for a court case. Yes, it's a shame it can't just be a pleasant place to take your kids but it isn't. It is filled with unrully children and uninterested parents. A child SHOULD NEVER leave a library with two bruises across his face EVER.