.
Feedback

Solutions to Gun Violence that Work

In order to reduce Gun Violence we need to discuss our options. "Just Say NO" is a worn out tactic that interferes with finding solutions to the tragic problem in America

The first thing gun advocates do when real solutions to reduce gun violence are proposed is to change the messaging of the discussion into something that will scare people. Using the terminology “Gun Control” is out of date and disingenuous to what The Fire Arm Safety Act is about. Licensing the purchase of guns is "Criminal Control" not gun control. If you are a law abiding citizen this will not prevent you from buying a handgun, a shotgun or a hunting rifle. These purchases are protected by the Second Amendment as many of you will tell me if I didn't spell it out here. This law does not attempt to change that. The case for gun policy reforms may be found here.

Look at the crime statistics in Maryland for yourself.

We can require a license to purchase a handgun with appropriate age restrictions, mandatory safety training and fingerprinting, in addition to the current background check done by the Maryland State Police without taking any law abiding citizen’s gun. Research indicates that a license-to-purchase requirement is associated with significantly lower levels of intrastate gun trafficking. A license to purchase would not be required for hunting rifles and shotguns. Why would hunters fight this proposal? This proposal is meant to reduce the number of people who should not possess a gun from pursuing that acquisition in the first place.

Seven states now require fingerprinting before a firearm purchase: California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, and New York. Straw purchases are the greatest source of guns that are used in the killing of human beings. It sounds reasonable to say “criminals will get gun no matter what the law is." The truth is, right now, some law abiding citizens are enticed into buying guns for those who should not have them because the straw buyer is offered an amount of money they cannot refuse. When the buyer is now required to go to the police station, go through a background check and fingerprinted it has been proven that the number of these kinds of guns become far less available on the street.

Limit Magazine Capacity to 10 Rounds. Maryland currently allows up to 20 rounds per magazine. The proposed legislation would reduce the allowable magazine capacity from 20 rounds to 10. By limiting the magazine capacity a rampage may be stopped sooner than it might otherwise be. The Aurora Movie Theater shooter was stopped while he was changing magazines. If only one person is not killed because of the enactment of this legislative act then it would be worth it. This will save lives.

Ban Military-Style Assault Weapons designed to kill and inflict the maximum amount of human carnage. Maryland currently bans only 15 enumerated assault pistols, but allows for the sale and possession of high-capacity, military weapons designed to kill. MPGV supports efforts to ban these assault weapons that are designed for the battlefield and have no place in our society.

And finally SB281 will provide the Maryland State Police with the authority to regulate firearm dealers and require that a licensed dealer keep records of all receipts, sales, and other dispositions of firearms affected in connection with the dealer’s business.

I take this proposed law very seriously. When a legislator whines about a $100 gun license fee I will remind him that I have lived the last 26 years of my life without my 17 year old brother who was killed by a hand gun because the parent of the shooter didn't have the gun locked away from the that child. Its time we took steps to reduce gun violence!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Perry Hall Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Steve February 6, 2013 at 06:05 pm
If the Capital of Gun Nuttery, Tucson, Arizona can close the gun show loophole then the Baltimore County Council should be able to also.
http://www.kvoa.com/news/tucson-bans-gun-shows-that-don-t-require-background-checks/
Mark Patro February 20, 2013 at 07:27 pm
Many other already believe these solutions work
https://www.change.org/petitions/support-solutions-to-gun-violence-that-work
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
cangmumayi1988 June 5, 2013 at 06:36 am
7>http://gstar2013.webs.com/ http://gstarpascher.webs.com/ http://gstarfemme.webs.com/Read More http://gstarhomme.webs.com/ http://vestegstar.webs.com/ http://gstarrawjeans.webs.com/ http://gstarrawpascher.webs.com/ http://soldesgstar.webs.com/ http://gstarenligne.webs.com/ http://discountgstar.webs.com/ http://poloralphlauren2013.webs.com/ http://abbigliamentoonline.webs.com/ http://2013ralphlaurenitalia.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurenuomo.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurensaldi.webs.com/
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 06:55 am
My sister-in-law actually played with my nephew too Tim. Unlike EVERY OTHER single parent that wasRead More there. However, you can't tie your child to you. They came there to play. Bullies move very quick. When my nephew fell and was visibily scared, not a single parent except for one even noticed. Nobody from the library was in site. You are right that if parents were required to pay attention to their children then there would not be an opportunities for bullies because the parents of those bullies would be watching them also. When the group came from a religious school in Pikesville this is exactly what happened. All the parents stayed with their kids. All other parents, with little exception stayed in a waiting room talking amongst themselves paying little attention to their children. My nephew has been to all kinds of playgrounds and never been attacked by older kids before. Next time, if my nephew is attacked by an older child I will urge my brother to call the police and press charges against the parent. However, irreponsible Storyville need not worry -- won't be back there. Just wish our tax dollars weren't supporting this.
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 07:09 am
Let me put this in more practical terms. 1. My sister-in-law suggests that the bully seemed about 8Read More years old and probably shouldn't have been left at Storyville to begin with. There is no ID system at Storyville for childs age. 2. The bully caused various kinds of mayhem. Knocking down things, shouting, etc. No one from the library is actually in Storyville so there was no disciplinary action taken such as removing the child. 3. Parents should not view Storyville as a babysitter and not be allowed to congregate in the waiting area, leaving their children to play alone. 4. Items that could be used to cause serious injury should be removed from Storyville. 5. Cameras. If an 8 year old hits a 3 year old at Storyville where parents are suppose to be watching their children, I want proof for a court case. Yes, it's a shame it can't just be a pleasant place to take your kids but it isn't. It is filled with unrully children and uninterested parents. A child SHOULD NEVER leave a library with two bruises across his face EVER.
BobBaft June 19, 2013 at 10:12 am
Sounds like your sister in law needs to grow a brain. If an 8 year old is running around like aRead More maniac, grab your child and GO FIND an employee to wage a complaint and get the kid booted. My daughter is 6 and went a couple weeks ago and was not permitted beyond the gate with the other kids in the group. Just because some ghetto monkey jumped the fence one day, don't give this place a black eye for it.