.
Feedback

Bishops Meadow Agreement Adds 11 Acres to Honeygo Park

The former Sokol property was added to the Perry Hall park along Honeygo Boulevard.

A land swap agreement recently enlarged Honeygo Run Regional Park by nearly 11 acres, County Councilman David Marks announced. 

Baltimore County traded 9.3 acres of land near the Perry Hall library for 10.8 acres of environmentally sensitive, forested property between the Maryland State Fish and Game Protective Association and Honeygo Run Regional Park. The county also gained ownership of 1.2 acres immediately south of the Perry Hall library, according to Marks.

The agreement is part of an ongoing plan to construct 50 single-family homes between the Perry Hall library and Cross Road, named the Bishops Meadow development. Plans were publicized during a community meeting in December 2011, where residents shared concerns about traffic and school overcrowding.

Marks ultimately supported the agreement because it represented a "net increase of protected acreage for Baltimore County," he stated. The 10.8-acre area, known as the Sokol property, at one time had been the proposed site for a gymnasium. It will now be protected from all future development, further buffering protected land and lakes owned by the Maryland State Fish and Game Protective Association.

"The two lakes that border this area are used not only by our members, but also by Cub Scouts and other residents who learn about fishing and the great outdoors," David Van Sant, president of the Maryland State Fish and Game Protective Association, stated in the release.

"With the addition of this property, Honeygo Park grows to 160 acres of protected land," Marks stated. "Honeygo Park is a treasure in northeastern Baltimore County and one of our greatest resources." 

The 1.2 acres immediately south of the Perry Hall library, also gained in the agreement, will eventually be used for a public playground and amphitheater. A  county-appointed committee announced their recommendation for the property in March 2012.

Share your take on the land swap in the comments.

Honeygo Hal November 26, 2012 at 02:21 pm
Good job, Mr. Marks! Smart development AND preservation for the public.
Weezie November 26, 2012 at 03:07 pm
How about finding some land for a school. We don't need 50 more houses when the high school is bursting at the seems and portable class rooms!
CarneyGirl November 26, 2012 at 03:18 pm
Excellent news! This will beautify the area, keep pollution down, and add community value! Thank you to all who helped in the effort.
H Long November 26, 2012 at 03:26 pm
It sounds good, just don't put the houses on the rd.like the other side of Cross Rd.Have at least a 25-30 ft setback for houses. The large houses in some of the newer neighborhoods around here look like crap sitting 10 feet from the road. Unsafe and ugly. PHIA biggest blunder the 10' setback. Let's not make the mistake anymore.
David Marks November 26, 2012 at 03:37 pm
Thank you to those who made positive comments. Weezie, I have argued for ten years for a new high school, long before I was elected. It should have been constructed when the county was flush with money. It will now cost more than $60 million; if you know of a propertyowner willing to donate the 35 acres to at least preserve the land, please let me know. The downzoning I initiated in Perry Hall over the past year will at least limit future overcrowding.
CarneyGirl November 26, 2012 at 03:37 pm
I agree with that H Long. Did you see on Joppa Rd the new housing development they built behind the Steakhouse Restaurant? The houses are nice looking but #1 horrible property views and #2 the one house is way too close to Joppa Rd. If anyone crashed there a car could easily wind up in the kitchen of the house! I think greed causes the builder to fit as many houses in as possible instead of aesthetics!
Steve November 26, 2012 at 05:09 pm
If the Construction Pricing Index is declining and the price of commodities is declining and wages are staying flat, why is the cost of constructing a new school rising?
Bob Kraft November 26, 2012 at 09:15 pm
Now that the park has more land, does that affect the dog park, that has been blocked by the Dept of Parks and Recreation with their demand for over 3 times the amount of money needed to build it ?
Pete R. November 26, 2012 at 09:21 pm
Good Point Steve you are absolutely Correct!

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Perry Hall Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
cangmumayi1988 June 5, 2013 at 06:36 am
7>http://gstar2013.webs.com/ http://gstarpascher.webs.com/ http://gstarfemme.webs.com/Read More http://gstarhomme.webs.com/ http://vestegstar.webs.com/ http://gstarrawjeans.webs.com/ http://gstarrawpascher.webs.com/ http://soldesgstar.webs.com/ http://gstarenligne.webs.com/ http://discountgstar.webs.com/ http://poloralphlauren2013.webs.com/ http://abbigliamentoonline.webs.com/ http://2013ralphlaurenitalia.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurenuomo.webs.com/ http://ralphlaurensaldi.webs.com/
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 06:55 am
My sister-in-law actually played with my nephew too Tim. Unlike EVERY OTHER single parent that wasRead More there. However, you can't tie your child to you. They came there to play. Bullies move very quick. When my nephew fell and was visibily scared, not a single parent except for one even noticed. Nobody from the library was in site. You are right that if parents were required to pay attention to their children then there would not be an opportunities for bullies because the parents of those bullies would be watching them also. When the group came from a religious school in Pikesville this is exactly what happened. All the parents stayed with their kids. All other parents, with little exception stayed in a waiting room talking amongst themselves paying little attention to their children. My nephew has been to all kinds of playgrounds and never been attacked by older kids before. Next time, if my nephew is attacked by an older child I will urge my brother to call the police and press charges against the parent. However, irreponsible Storyville need not worry -- won't be back there. Just wish our tax dollars weren't supporting this.
Gregg Roberts April 25, 2013 at 07:09 am
Let me put this in more practical terms. 1. My sister-in-law suggests that the bully seemed about 8Read More years old and probably shouldn't have been left at Storyville to begin with. There is no ID system at Storyville for childs age. 2. The bully caused various kinds of mayhem. Knocking down things, shouting, etc. No one from the library is actually in Storyville so there was no disciplinary action taken such as removing the child. 3. Parents should not view Storyville as a babysitter and not be allowed to congregate in the waiting area, leaving their children to play alone. 4. Items that could be used to cause serious injury should be removed from Storyville. 5. Cameras. If an 8 year old hits a 3 year old at Storyville where parents are suppose to be watching their children, I want proof for a court case. Yes, it's a shame it can't just be a pleasant place to take your kids but it isn't. It is filled with unrully children and uninterested parents. A child SHOULD NEVER leave a library with two bruises across his face EVER.
BobBaft June 19, 2013 at 10:12 am
Sounds like your sister in law needs to grow a brain. If an 8 year old is running around like aRead More maniac, grab your child and GO FIND an employee to wage a complaint and get the kid booted. My daughter is 6 and went a couple weeks ago and was not permitted beyond the gate with the other kids in the group. Just because some ghetto monkey jumped the fence one day, don't give this place a black eye for it.