Some of the 15 speed cameras in Baltimore County school zones could be moved to new locations, according to county police Chief Jim Johnson.
Johnson, in an interview Wednesday, said a review of the original 15 cameras, installed just over a year ago, was recently completed.
"I've been looking at the current 15 camera sites and I'm making recommendations as to whether or not some of the cameras should be moved to other locations," Johnson said, adding that "there are a few sites that could be changed."
Johnson declined to say how many cameras could be moved as a result of what he called "a lengthy analysis."
The cameras issue $40 tickets to drivers caught exceeding the speed limit in school zones by more than 12 mph.
Johnson has previously told county officials that in changing the habits of speeding drivers.
A list of potential new sites has been sent to the administration for approval, Johnson said. He declined to say what school zones have been recommended.
In February, the County Council approved a law allowing the county to in school zones around the county. The original bill, passed in 2010, limited the county to just 15 speed cameras.
The county has, however, faced budgetary challenges because of the economic downturn. Earlier this year, county officials told members of the county's General Assembly delegation that it had , despite the change in the law.
CORRECTION: An earlier edition of this article incorrectly stated the speed that must be exceeded in order for the camera to issue a ticket.
How much ELECTRONIC FACISM are you willing to submit to?
The answer is no because I haven't gotten a ticket of any kind in at least 10 years but I have to pay for these camera's. You just made my argument for me and you never answered the question. Why do you move the camera's if it's about safety? Shouldn't you be adding camera's if they are only for safety? Who cares if 99% of the camera's don't make a dollar if it's about safety? So to answer your question radar and speed camera's exists for one purpose - revenue. If it was about safety you don't move the camera because its not making any money, if it's not making money you should think that it's doing its job. If it was about safety there wouldn't be quota's for the cops to hand out tickets, there wouldn't be fines all you would need is a point system. You get pulled over and accumulate X amount of points you lose your license for X amount of months. Why is there always a dollar amount attached to everything? RE VE NUE.
The loser resorts to insults and avoids the argued facts.
A percentage of safety is better then zero percent. Thank you for your input and thank you for the cameras , at least I spelled it correct this time.
That is great information. Get the whole gang out and give this idea a try. Then when it works, look at all the money you will save by not having to pay a ticket for breaking the law. The money you save could take you to a race tract where you can rent a race car and enjoy the speed. But why put innocent people in danger to fulfil your thrills.
That is easy, economics. not enough money to put one on every corner. So if you have the attention of some of the law abiding citizen in one area, you have given them the opportunity to learn and understand the speed limits. Then why not move them and give another area a chance to learn the same lesson. Some folks will never heed the warning and some are out only to beat the system. You can not do anything with those types of folks. When the camera is missing the folks will resume the old habits. BUT NOT everyone. Some sensible ones will retain the lesson learned. We do not have a percentage on those folks in which camp they reside. My guess is more good guys out there then fools.
I once received a warning in a speed trap. I was in an area that was 30 mph and that was easy because of the trafic. Then I entered a wide open bridge across 695. My speed picked up because the traffic was so light and no cross traffic. I got caught and left with a warning. I never cross that bridge without thinking of my warning and the proper speed limit. Most drivers behind me think I have decided to stop. But I am still going 30 across that bridge. It is a brain thing. If I were out to beat the system, I would never cross that bridge doing only 30.
Parents can teach children and must teach them but a speeding car is no match for anyone , not even another car, bus or van , much less for a student and her protective parent walking beside her.
Now that is funny. I am not arguing with him, I am just having my say. He should not take it so seriously. I could not possible have any effect on a person like Rob. I know that. He is unchangeable.
I can't wait to get out of this state.
You do understand this is only an opinion post and our post will have no effect on what really happens. The government has always had it on way. And that is certainly not because I post an opinion. Gosh according to you, I have so much power. But that not true so don;t let me get under your skin and make you angry .
Speed cameras force people to, at least temporarily, follow the LAW. People piss and moan because they don't like them. Oh dear goodness, how dare they enforce the laws! I do understand the perspective of not liking to have to "pay" the state to enforce the laws, but guess what? That's long been a valid responsibility of government. Dating back to the 1770s. If you don't break the law, it won't adversely affect you - and you know what? I'm also betting if enough people start following the rule of law one of these days, the state will remove them as they won't be "profiting" off of rule breakers. They will stay in place while they still fiscally make sense. You can be sure of that. It's crystal clear the people against speed cameras are in the minority, which is fine. They are here to stay, until maryland drivers stop sucking at driving. I won't be holding my breath on that one.
4:35pm on Saturday, September 17, 2011 I can't wait to get out of this state.
Yes, I know what the government can do. Yes, I'm OK with the IRS having the ability to print out what publications I get. Guess what?if the federal government wants your information, they are getting it whether you like it or not. It's already catalogged. Most idiots broadcast it all on "social media" as it is. Makes the government's job easy. For entertainment's sake, I'll throw another option for you I'd love to see: - people ticketed and/or fined for cell phone use (unless hands free) as a primary offense. Talk about a safety issue! I'd gladly vote to take down every speed camera in the state if it meant getting this law passed. I am well aware of the various programs going on with the government and monitoring. However, unlike most people, my sliding scale of common sense use doesn't stick to one extreme or the other. The concept of being a moderate is generally lost in this nation - and it sure as hell is in Washington. Today, Tea Party morons voted to stop funding the government - and FEMA support - because the corresponding cuts weren't enough to their liking. So once again we're looking at a potential government shutdown in 9 days. Here's something else for you to chew on. Speaking of On-Star: http://www.autoblog.com/2011/09/21/gms-onstar-now-spying-on-your-car-for-profit-even-after-you-uns/
1) You're talking about personal privacy versus a moving violation/operating a motor vehicle. 2) You're also talking a non-safety issue (trespass) versus a safety issue (speeding). Now onto your others: - Airport, again, it's personal privacy issue - this is different from following a traffic law and endangering others. Actually, I am so against the TSA garbage I refuse to fly. Beyond the personal liberty angle, the TSA simply doesn't work to begin with. These people would be mall cops somewhere if not for this crap. There are plenty of holes in the entire system that if someone REALLY wanted to smuggle a boxcutter onto an aircraft - I'm sure they could. Air travel was the safest form of transportation before 9/11/01, and I don't believe that changes with or without these rent-a-cops today. Of course, it wouldn't hurt to get out of most of the Middle East's business. That's another topic. - The whole speed camera/onstar surveillance in the vehicle is my threshold. Again, we're talking purely a personal privacy issue. Especially if you're including a microphone issue. I wouldn't be entirely against a speed monitor (alone) on vehicles - it would depend on the specifics of the implementation. let me continue this in a seperate post.